-
Website
http://www.imediapress.com -
Original page
http://www.imediapress.com/rp/2008/09/02/why-chrome-and-not-a-better-firefox/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
l0rri
1 comment · 1 points
-
Financial consultant Rochester
2 comments · 1 points
-
talktalk1
2 comments · 2 points
-
HDTV Store
1 comment · 1 points
-
fdeblauwe
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Indeed partnership was not enough! We will be facing a problem of duopoly between Microsoft and Google. Google is still moving forward to controlling search engines and web platforms. By the time it will be prosecuted by antitrust measures it will be too late (like it was too late for Microsoft on the desktop).
One can contribute to diminish IE market share while keeping Firefox market share by pushing IE users to switch to Firefox.
So the question is "Does Evil Comes Naturally to Corporations?"
I do not know what I would do without my toolbar extensions.
I have no plans to ever leave Firefox i know that most people in my industry feel the same.
http://blogs.vmware.com/vmtn/2008/09/google-chr...
"It's smoking fast!"
is there any such facility with googlechrome.
thanks
Now how do you interpret that is a question
How can Google make a browser that doesn't allow an Adblock extension if it's open source anyway? Anyone with programming knowledge could modify Chrome to have extension support and even block ads if Google doesn't even implement such a feature.
For the time being, Google Chrome does not accept
any extensions:
http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer...
very little info there at the moment. I'd be surprised if it they don't eventually provide support, but as the article states, there are some very good reasons why they wouldn't.
Don't forget Chrome is open source... Therefore, soon enough there shall be add-ons, and believe me one of these will something like Ad-Block...
Both the interface and the way they speed things up (the way pages load) are just plain annoying.
It DOES suck.